It's story (insofar as M&B, either classic or Warband, has a story, rather than being a sandbox) is the same as M&B. It doesn't take place any "later," in universe, after the events of M&B. Note that Warband is not really so much a sequel of Mount & Blade as an expanded version of it. I'm not sure exactly what the arguments are, and certainly some people think that Warband combat is better too, but I have heard the claim that original M&B had better combat for whatever reason. Some people, though, think the the combat in the original Mount & Blade was better. Warband gets some DLCs like Napoleonic Wars and Viking Conquest, and more mods. Faction with desert territories, mamluke cavalry that is essentially a match for Swadian knights, good archers, and fairly crappy infantry. You can now start your own kingdom in Warband in standard M&B, you can only be a vassal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |